Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Olympics and Ceremonies
As someone who was both awed and a little put off by the spectacle two years ago, it was kind of nice to watch something where not every choreographed triumph carried an onslaught of portentousness. When one of the giant icicle-things didn’t rise up out of the ground at the end for the torch-lighting, it was just kind of like, “Oh well. Woohoo Olympics!” instead of “This betokens shame for the public face of our nation in the world.” There were nonetheless some really beautiful moments and innovative presentations, executed in a soft, gently artistic style that contrasted with the Chinese event without diametrically opposing it. The video projection-floor was genuinely pretty cool and used in such a way that continually surprised, and the merging of the two dimensional with the space above it was lovely and startling. Some parts were kind of over-the-top and kind of ridiculous, but it’s the Olympics, so I guess I can’t really blame the producers for deciding that this was the time to just kind of let go.
I think it was a measure of the difference in approaches that after the Chinese ceremony, I felt the need to make grand cultural proclamations, to boldly differentiate between their culture and mine, while after this one I just wanted to go hang out with friends or something. Neither reaction seems to me bad, and both seem within the Olympic spirit. I’ve always loved the Olympics: the competition, the diversity, the way in which it remains such a defiant symbol of global communication and interaction. Both a fierce dedication to your country being the best and a willingness to relax a little bit seem compatible with those things.
And though I’m hesitant to set up this ceremony as the true counterpoint to Beijing, being winter instead of summer, the flipside of the openness and intimacy (relatively speaking) of these ceremonies is that there was perhaps a bit of a void left at its center. When the slam poet spoke, it was kind of interesting to me for two reasons: first, it was largely the kind of neo-romantic rhetoric that I associate with proclamations of Americanism (not that surprising I guess, but still it was a little odd to hear all these phrases about dreams and diversity and then hear “Canada” at the end of them); and second, that rhetoric, while inspiring and kind of wonderful, really does leave a bit of an empty hole at its center, as it is less about what is now than what will be. That impulse makes sense to me; but it also leaves me a little bit curious about what’s really at the other end of the spectrum from what we saw two years ago. London 2012 maybe?
- video of the opening ceremony, part 1
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Of the Blue Colour of the Sky (OK Go)
—from OK Go’s latest album, the pleasingly titled Of the Blue Colour of the Sky, the fourth track and my initial favorite, “Needing/Getting.” Like a lot of their lyrics, they’re clever, and unlike a lot of them, more than a little heartfelt. That seems to be where their latest is aimed, bringing the self-conscious, guiltlessly indulgent brashness of their particular brand of pop towards a place a little more enigmatic. It’s a worthwhile effort, one that even succeeds occasionally, but the problem is that the album equates restraint with sophistication, ambiguity with adulthood. The band distorts their lyrics nearly beyond recognition, a veneer of production—and it does sound very fine more often than not, crackling and crunching in all sorts of shades of white—usurping the feeling the words were meant to betray. The end result isn’t bad, just a little gray, and less saturated than you had hoped. It’s all surface, textured and nuanced but surface nonetheless. And that’s too bad, because what’s there is good enough to make you wish the band had decided to grow up in their own way instead of somebody else’s, forging their own paradigm instead of their idols’.
The album traffics in nostalgia, which is not a surprising move, for them or for us these days. It’s the flipside of that knowing sway, of that determined air that lends a direction to progress, the new adult who’s just a little too old to be young. It’s not a little expected, and because of that, disappointing in equal measure. When things seem as though they’re not working out, the wise choice, the right choice, is acceptance: acceptance without compromise. It’s an admission of fallibility but a wholehearted determination to invention, to moving forward even if it’s a little stupid to do so; because every once in a while a little stupidity is demanded, and never more so than when at the beginning of something. Nostalgia, while lovely and acceptable, is the easy route in a bad way when it constitutes the greater part of your reasoning.
And essentially, that feeling is: being lost. Whether citizens or rock stars, the one thing we can agree on is being stuck in that funk and wanting something to happen. The difficulty results from a plurality of options rather than their dearth, an experience that seems like growing up all over again and is confusing because it’s not. We understand that impulse to action and needing something to happen, and the call to hearken back is understandable but not excusable; there should be leaders, not shepherds, because when you’ve discovered something that feels disconcertingly like youth you’re not ready to be gently guided; you’re ready to be told what to do so that you can joyfully and ecstatically rebel. Moderation only means something in between extremes.
The first side of that equation is securely in hand. We have the brashness of youth underneath our belt, the boom years when everything was a discovery. But now we’re on the verge of finding everything a recapitulation, of letting that luxurious distortion of stored-up knowledge and sound obscure inherent originality. It’s easy to forget that things started in chaos, that seeming atrophy can be at least as much of a spur to newness as can order. You have to reject the false duality of escapism versus realism; there are escapes in this world that involve no compromise. It’s time to move forward.
Before the earth was round, there was no end to things; no one tried to measure what they knew. Everything was warm, and everyone would love, and every contradiction was true. The sun worked twice as hard, and the moon was twice as far, and the sky was still honestly blue. But when the time came, everything spiraled in, and everyone forgot what they knew.
—from Of the Blue Colour of the Sky, track nine, “Before the Earth was Round”
- WTF?
- This Too Shall Pass
- This Too Shall Pass v2
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Avatar: A small footnote to a large movie
Upfront and to say it right away, I enjoyed Avatar. I was mesmerized for the better part of three hours, drawn thoroughly into a world so vividly rendered. Furthermore, the 3-D—about which I was more skeptical than not beforehand, expecting at worst to have to dodge crap flying at my face and at best a gimmick the novelty of which would wear off quickly—was kind of beautiful, underwriting the lushness of the film with an almost minimal elegance, a new aesthetic. The world had a depth which made immersion that much more effortless, and the varying planes of depth brought to mind those staggered dioramas, or those animations where everything takes place on two or three discrete fields of action.
It is a testament to the success of the world created by the film that I found the story within it compelling more often than not, a triumph of technique that emerges as artistic. That said, it’s a shame it wasn’t a better movie. If it was as awesome as it was with a narrative as lousy as it had, it makes me wish to see the movie that could have been made if the graphics weren’t the only thing doing the heavy lifting. And though it’s beside the point to say that if Avatar were rendered as a stage script with a minimal set it would be nigh-unwatchable, it’s worth saying once anyway if only to get it out of your system. What happens in its world is oddly, inexplicably compelling (I almost said subtly, but say what you will about it, Avatar is not a subtle movie), but that stems not from anything exceptional in its plot or characters or all that jazz, but the need to stay in its world for just a few minutes longer. That need could have been tied to virtually any motivation and be rendered nearly as urgent, as its environs would still demanded to be lived in, breathed in and stared at longingly through surprisingly cool glasses in wave-of-the-future 3D.
That its narrative is one of the most self-congratulatorily tolerant and fundamentally imperialistic narratives in the cultural lexicon is a matter of convenience rather than any deep-seated malice on the film’s part. The natives in this film—a mashup of virtually every quote-unquote indigenous or primitive cultural stereotype the film could get its hands on (real and fictional both)—are, as usual, in tune with nature and love one another and in really good shape and stuff. As the story dictates, their worth is uncountable as compared with the malignancy of what is corporate, and they deeply deserve to be left in peace after the friendly imperialist shows them the way to war, salvation, and their need for an enlightened leader.
But this is (rather unfortunately) nothing unusual; these convictions are skin-deep at best, because apparently that’s all three dimensions are good for. After we cast aside any noun to which the modifier “nominal” can apply, what are we left with? With what is still an engrossing world, a thoroughly awesome film. I admire the work’s dedication to that childish joy of creation and fantasy, and its success in reinvigorating the experience so thoroughly that to complain seems almost beside the point. I truly fell into the scope of its world, and there is also the critic’s satisfaction to be had of a pop-cultural phenomenon that can be legitimately got behind. But now, after having had some time to let it mull and stew in my head, it turns out the film was perhaps shallower than it seemed, that the resonance that comes from true depth was lacking. So while it was awesome, I wish it were better.
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
From back home
We accomplished a couple of activities we wanted to: kayaking through the mangrove forest (spectacular and tiring), snorkeling around Santa Catalina. But the more significant events involved our making friends, after three months and all at once. From the waitress at our restaurant to the owners at the hotel to friends who landed in the middle of our life there from absolutely nowhere at all, we spent the last week actually getting to know people and experiencing the island in a radically different way from before. It was a sensational way to end the trip and just a little sad, as we managed to make connections just before we left for good, but perhaps we needed the impetus of a departure date to spur us across that unseen divide. I’m not going to recount everything that happened here, because I’m feeling lazy at the moment, and as I’ve discovered with having a blog, telling a story here denies me the pleasure of telling it to friends in person.
But we left for Bogota in a lovely blur of activity, and then arrived to the warm embrace of Silvia’s family for several days. In addition to hearing more Spanish in the last few days than I had heard in all of Providencia, we ate quite a lot and saw a good bit of Bogota. It’s always nice to have residents showing you around a place, so that the city becomes more than just a name on a map and an assembly of sensations, and Bogota was no different. Spending time with a Bogota family (and since it was the holidays, there was a lot of that family around) was just as fun and educative as seeing the city, and also provided a final test of my meager Spanish abilities, which if I passed, I did so just barely scraping by.
Bogota is an interesting city. It’s big, which I had been told before, but that wasn’t quite driven home until we were standing on top of Monserrate and watching the vista of the city from mountain to mountain. It’s a sprawling breadth, too: I was totally unconfronted with the overwhelming density of New York or even Paris, finding instead a spacious, even sparse agglomeration that struck me almost as a smaller city that was larger than it should be. There are small, beautiful historical quarters in the city, but to me they seemed to function less as the pulse of the urban life now than as museums for what it once was. Four days is not enough to truly get a grasp on a place, but Bogota seemed to me a city unlike others I have seen.
Then I got back home, immersed in a comprehensible language and winter air that is actually cold, not just the-ocean-is-so-cold-today kind of cold. There was some reacclimation for sure, but having spent time abroad before I was fairly well prepared for it.
And thus ends the chronicle of Providencia. I will continue to keep writing and posting moving forward, though the content will be less centered around my day-to-day activities than before. But for the moment, I’ll just end with a Happy Holidays and Happy New Year!
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Looking for things underwater
But then this past Friday, we went snorkeling for the first time in a while. (Although once again, I didn’t actually have a snorkel, just flippers and goggles, so I guess it was really just goggling. Kind of like Googling, but underwater.) We swam for quite a while, and at around the midpoint we found ourselves on Crab Cay, the islet we had been to before about two months ago. There was nobody else there at all, so we had it all to ourselves for the afternoon, and took advantage by lying down on the dock in the late afternoon sun for half an hour and doing nothing in particular. Sitting there on the dock, with the entirety of Providencia y Santa Catalina spread out in front of us and the sun setting into the mountains, it struck me anew, being as isolated and far away from normalcy as I’ve ever been. And then we jumped back in the water, and startled a cloud of calamari into spraying their ink and darting away, and the feeling stayed. Coral reefs will do that to you.
So will meeting other people who are just as intent on savoring the experience, culinary and otherwise. The other day we made friends with a Swiss couple who was here on their honeymoon, and met up with them several times. The first time, they brought along a Spanish couple they had met, and after a not insignificant period of requisite awkwardness, we all ended up talking about Christmas traditions in different countries. (Turns out the Swiss Santa is considerably more violent than the U.S. version, and the Catalonian manger has at least one figurine you would never expect to be there. Hint: the Spanish name is el Cagon*.) The Spanish couple left the next day, and later in the week we went out for dinner again with the Swiss couple and one other Swiss woman they met at their hotel. To the extremely incongruous sound of Enya playing from the restaurant speakers, I ended up talking with the Swiss couple for a while about health care, but more generally about medicine (they’re both med students in their residencies, she’s an OB/GYN and he’s focused on public health). It was really interesting to hear them speak, both from the perspective of doctors who know a lot about medicine and members of a different system who have an outside view on the U.S. And though health care can’t really compete with miles of clear blue water, afterwards it did seem just a little bit new.
*it means "the shitter." It's apparently pretty much exactly what it sounds like.